In order to proceed further in modern Templar debunking, I need to state that there will be some deliberate spelling errors of names, I am sure you will be able to work out the rationale for this as we progress.
So who are the modern groups claiming to be Templar descendants or continuations?
There are numerous weird and wonderful offshoots using a very bloody name that has been romanticized beyond anything resembling its actual history. I will attempt to outline a few of the more popular ones in an effort to shine some truth on these fraudsters.
The main modern fraudulent Templar pretenders / protagonists are:
SMOTJ Belgian based and founded in the 1800’s after many schisms most of the neo groups try to add or incorporate this title into their names, It was originally a 1850’s Swiss established group led by a homosexual freemason club founded out of respect for the Templar ethos , this group in reality ceased to be in 1943 after the unscrupulous theft of their documents and their leaders unfortunate death in a car accident and this theft by a Portuguese pretender led to the renaming of the club and OSMTH1 to be founded in 1947.
OSMTH1 ”the 1943 stolen/1947 founded neo club, commonly known as the Sovereign Fon group”,
OSMTH2 “the 1998 founded Masonic Supremes copy” is yet another splinter group evolving from the OSMTH 1(est 1943), this group tries to ignore any truth or history and go as far as publishing their own propaganda profusely to hide their fake origins, they are the most internet savvy group of modern times.
OSMTH3 Strangely SKT OCMTH’’s magical fairy Lieutenant McG invented another schism in 2008 by promulgating the old OSMTH SAE’s Font’s falsified retirement notice in 2008 and by also hand-picking a supposed replacement. SKT OCMTH’s new pet Patron Roserya. It seems HH Roserya is willing to espouse and uphold the Masonic ban to a new level of paranoia and ludicrousness, with people being sanctioned for even knowing anything about masons. He is quite obsessive on this issue and is leading both the SKT OCMTH and OSMTH3 Sovereigns’ at this time( both are very small Catholic only offshoots of OSMTH 1). The retirement of Fon is a quite a fabrication as it is easy to find him on the net doing the rounds of OSMTH 1&2 meetings as guest of honour etc in 2009 and 2010. Just more easily disproven lies from the terrible SKT OCMTH unfortunately.
OSMTHU “the 1990 founded unionists who tried to oust the masons diplomatically but lost and in turn became a masonic extension and are now quite openly led by a freemason”.
IFA “another 1990’s clean out the freemasons attempt by the anti mason/ pro Catholic group; “This failed and the IFA or international federative alliance has become another badge collectors heaven for templar pretenders” This group still exists despite the many attempts of the other clubs to close them. In reality they do nothing but talk about what they might do next year and collect fees and badges. This club is ’technically’ accepting of Anglicans, Church of England, Church of Scotland and any other Christian group but does show an active preference towards Catholics. Interestingly the head of SKT OCMTH( who was a founding member) led a Protestant purge of his membership via their American Grand Prior in the mid 90’s which resulted in non-catholic Christians being ostracised. This has resulted in the neo club being reviled or ignored by all modern Christian churches.
SKT OCMTH , the smallest of the neo-clubs and possibly the most interesting. They claim a 1963 claim to establishment( est.1980 actually)...and lately have tried to claim ancestry via a string of unrelated land deeds with the word Templar somewhere in them. These poor souls really have forked tongues and limited intelligence. They really were formed in the mid 1980’s and reinvented themselves yet again in late 2009 after another schism and are anti everything but Catholicism (but the Catholic Church hates them with a passion as they tend to lie about church association and ethos) and have recently conducted persecution and expulsions of protestant, women and anyone smart enough to question their so called “historical claims”. Beware this neo group; they are constantly persecuting their own members and are generally ignored... but do make interesting reading and mental health subjects. This group is tyrannically led by a Scot who, with his increasing age, unfortunately struggles with reality and expels anyone who questions the constant lies he tells.
OCCPTS./OSMTH USA, as always with anything of repute, the freemasons try to get involved “a current USA military boys club” (established in 1998 ) Originally they called themselves the OCCPTS but after they had embarrassed themselves enough with lies and an opportunity to steal a credible name (via trademark law) arrived they reformed under OSMTH USA. They have lamely attempted to lay a claim to fame via the Templar myths. The proof (above) on masonic association and the Church proves beyond doubt these unfortunates to be fantasy propagators’ but more proof will be presented for those poor souls still in denial.
They are also great fodder for investigation as they go as far as to invent their own royal titles and deeds /creeds and honestly think they can buy the Templar ethos without any of that pesky Christian ethos like believing in God as being necessary. Their current leader was knighted by a Ethiopian prince who had been dead for over 7 years on the date of the knighthood and crest being conferred!
There are also many smaller less organised neo groups such as the Gnostic Templars etc... I will deal with their ridiculous claims as they pop up in this story.
Lets us go back to the beginning of modern Knight Templar emulators and the Freemason who founded the SMOTJ
It is important at this stage to recognise that the ex-Swiss/Belgian and now Portuguese led neo-Order OSMTH1 are not and never have been Scottish Knight Templars. This because no group ever has really been Scottish Knight Templars, they just have never existed now or in history.
The OSMTH1 are however claiming however to be an ancient branch of Knight Templars founded under the auspices of the Napoleonic era. They are not ancient unless you consider the Mid 1800’s ancient; and that the Templars are a Masonic social branch of the Church.
I state this with confidence as the OSMTH1,OSMTH2,OCMTH,OSMTHU, and OSMTH USA all had a common founder, he was a well known socialite and freemason.
It is worthy also to revise how the ex-leader of OSMTH Fon (osmtj est 1943 via the hijack of the Masonic SMOTJ club est 1890’s) claimed his title, by refusing to give property he was minding during the second world war back until the owner died and then magically being to lazy to even invent a document to will the leadership to his progeny, he just said he wanted it to happen (in secret to someone in his club evidently).
It is truly telling that the OSMTH1 Fon led order had very few followers for a few decades, because Fon refused to return the documents he was safeguarding for the real Templar leader during the 2nd world war, ( the real leader was Belgian).
The real Templar Leader asked for the documents he had asked Fon to mind to be returned... and Fon simply and dishonourably refused. Unfortunately the real Leader was then killed in a car accident not long after. Fon then used this opportunity to seize the leadership and falsely elect himself as the new head,
it get worse!
more fully explained here:
"the Temple of Jerusalem. Hoping to re-establish this Order of the Temple as an international organization, a regency was formed. Emile-Isaac Vandenberg, as regent, devoted much of his energy to revitalizing Templar Priories across Europe, including France, Italy, Portugal and Switzerland. Such a promising development was cut short by the Second World War. Viewing the German occupation of Belgium as a danger to Templar survival, Vandenberg made a temporary transfer of the leadership and archives of the Order to the care of the Portuguese Grand Prior, Antonio Campello de Sousa Fon. Once the war had ended, Vandenberg requested the return of the archives. Then de Sousa Fon took advantage of the sudden death of Vandenberg to assume the title of Regent. Once more there was schism, with some Priories rejecting his leadership. In 1960"
from http://www.smotjnyc.org/history.htm
This is close, but has errors; in the dates as Vandenburg died in 43 not 45 from an auto accident, but he did ask for the documents back after he was certain they would be safe in Belgium before his untimely death. Our boy Fon just refused to hand them over... and unfortunately then Vandenburg died in a 1943 car accident( the Nazi's couldn’t exactly be asked to intervene could they!).
Now for revealing the Dom or Count title part of the Fon family.
This Polish Royal has plenty to say http://www.angelfire.com/realm/StStanislas/Wrobel.html
Fon was supposedly given his fake titles originally by a Mr William Masser,(who had many other claims to titles as well) a builder from New Jersey USA.
Do a quick search in any heraldry site, you will find our good Mr Masser had no titles and absolutely no power to award anything to anyone.
Mr Masser bought his fake titles(and there were plenty of them bought by Mr Masser) from a very clever Brazilian farmer named Pascal Bandeita Moreria who claimed he was the direct descendant of a "Visigothic, King Atulf" of the 5th century, it's like a Ripleys installment isn’t it? Mr Moreria has never produced any shred of evidence to support his grandiose claims. Unfortunately for all these fakers, Atulf married and died in the same year leaving no children.
http://www.slu.edu/colleges/AS/languages/classical/latin/tchmat/pedagogy/chron/romchr11.html
Cambridge Professor and Vatican Committee Member on Orders of Chivalry, Dr Peter Bander van Duren; has also published of several books on Chivalry has less kind things to say about Fon’ pathetic claims that some deluded members of the OSMTH/OSMTHU/OCCPTS AND OSMTH USA still hold onto;
" Pinto De Fon is regarded as a buffoon, a figure of fun and a pathetic megalomaniac. "
" All his titles (Pinto Fon added for clarity) have been assumed by him and/or his father. He is not entitled to the appellation "Dom". He is not entitled to the appellation "Count" etc. Also his activities as "Consul" OF Two South American States are described as illegal under Portuguese law" .
These quotes about the Fon dynasty are from a Cambridge Professor and Vatican Committee Member on Orders of Chivalry. You just cannot get any clearer than that about the Fon led groups such as OSMTH/OSMTHU/OSMTH USA/OCCPT ect.
Fon then verbally willed the regency to his son! This caused many to abandon the hope he would ever repent and return the documents to their rightful place.
All the schisms /masonic activity/infighting today in the Templar world are direct results of this despicable act by this so-called "dynasty". There is much debate about his current status but as mentioned before, he still does the rounds of meetings etc.
This has resulted in the formation of many offshoot clubs such as the self-professed and invented neo-groups OCMTH IFA, SMOTJ the many new and easily proven false SKT groups... (there never was a dedicated Scottish templar group OCMTH or Scottish Priory...just many Templars who happened to be Scottish, McG invents and then publicises secret “truths” in order to use public ignorance to try to promote his own neo club (est. 1980), other offshoots such as OSMTHU/OSMTH-USA/OCCPTS to name a few, thankfully recognise this.
You do have to give Fon some credit for sheer gall; as his style of transmission without witness or document to back it up has been followed by two other self invented/kidnapped Clubs...Comrs UK styled OSMTH1 and McGs invented SKT OCMTH.
Note here where Comr and the OSMTH2 pretenders state Vandenburg transferred the titles etc on the 23rd Dec 1943 to Fon. Good trick that and pretty hard to do as Vandenburg was actually dead from a car accident on the 11th April 1943, it’s all too hard for poor Mr Comr, he really has no idea, so he just makes it up. Not much different to his teacher McG of the SKT OCMTH really.
http://ordomilitaristempli.org/Antonio_Fon.html
The below site outlines things pretty well.
http://skt-stanthony.741.com/poor_knights.htm
More modern insights into this infighting:
OSMTH1 ‘s previous well respected and long serving German HSE (His Serene Excellency) GP ( Grand Prior) Werna sort of" upheld the Masonic ban and fought the masonic takeover for decade until he foolishly formed an alliance with McG of
the SKT OCMTH in 2008 , SKT OCMTH’s inventor McG, then proceeded to organize a coupe in favour of a friend of his and subsequently installed his own follower.
The Germans now cry loudly about being mason free but in reality welcome masons and their money within their ranks. ...as does the new dodgily “ elected” ( another false claim) Chef Mondial of new( 1980 est) established SKT OCMTH and now (finally) so does the new falsly installed and vey paranoid SAE of the Portuguese led scots (SKT OCMTH)( he was put in place by McG illegally by the neo orders own statutes on new years eve of 2008, the new patron (SAE Roserya) of OSMTH3.
He has also been given the title as Royal Patron of the OSMTH3 by incredibly the SKT OCMTH after they falsely proclaimed Font’s resignation via"forced" retirement to Spain due to health issues / tax problems in Oporto.
However if you do a quick search of more modern OSMTH1 gatherings you can see this is another McG / GFR SKT OCMTH fabrication.
Another sad fact is there have never been any Order called the SKT, there were Templars who were Scottish but not what a few devious men now call SKT’s.
This fact is particularly attempted to be hidden/ignored by the SKT OCMTH (est. 1980) However, the self appointed then Chef Mondial( he has since promoted himself (by just announcing his promotion to his followers)to 1st Lieutenant of SKT OCMTH. He simply ignored his own neo Orders statues ( I suppose he could as he made them up in the first place in this very tyranical neo-order) and invented a new position for himself and his imaginary 4 other princes in December of 2008. His own American Keeper of the Laws had no idea about this promotion and it was against his own clubs statues. His arrogance( or dementia) is so advanced that he has not even bothered to ex post facto law the changes to his position and title. So in reality he breaking his own clubs laws and should be outed.
He is great fun to watch; as is his American GP who was actually threatened with legal action last time he tried to associate himself with charity and he was forced to quickly remove the links he tried to falsely put on his website.
This OCMTH SKT clubs front page states this on their page; NATURE OF THE ORDER.
The Order is Autocratic, Ecumenical, Strictly Non Masonic. All Practising Christians are welcomed into membership without prejudice of Sex, Race,Colour, Nationality. We do not accept Freemasons, or ex Freemasons, into our Order. They not being accepted as being Christians,to us, or to any of the Christian and Orthodox Churches whom we as Christian Knights fully support. We remind all Catholics and Orthodox Christians,the ban on them taking the Holy Sacraments if joining the Freemasons. This confirmed by His Holiness POPE BENEDICT XV1,and all of the Patriarchs, the ban still stands for eternity.
on in Perpetuity within the Scottish Grand Priory of SKT-SMOTJ only. The title was passed in December 2008 to the Next legally elected Grand Prior of Scotland, elected by secret ballot of our SMOTJ current members of this Order only. Current Chef Mondial is HSE Chev Graham Russell. We are sure the reader will concur that to be a true Scottish Knight Templar, one must be able to support and to uphold the unique position that Scotland now holds within Templar History? A History which is totally superior to any of the false claims made by all these other false Neo Templars. If you do not accept this Sovereign Orders position. Please do not waste your time in attempting to join us.
In reality there was NO election...it was done solely( on new years eve 2008) by McG alone and then later posted on a website for everyone else to follow. Typically it is McG's style, a lie to cover his abuse of his supposed Statutes and the WV covers it up by retrospectively hiding the Statutes that dont allow this kind of unchristian action to happen and thus it continues. Also the Vox which dissolved the Templars also still stands and is ratified by the current Pope and all previous Popes, something which they seem to be deliberately ignorant of and thus any calling themselves Templar are also not allowed to accept the sacrements by Vatican declaration. hypocrisy is his middle name.
To do this SKT OCMTH’s McG first had to illegally pass his Chef Mondial position to his sycophantic and not very bright follower G. F R (2008 New Year’s Eve,) this was done without any form of council or election or even resignation, so in fact by SKT OCMTH’s own statutes they really had 2 Chef Mondials until McG finally retired from the position months later and announced he was a magic fairy prince and 1st Lieutenant of the imaginary Order, incredibly even his own Order don’t know who the other 4 magic fairy princes are! I shall reveal them later in another blog.
Notably they lie also about this.
"2005 The Chief Mondial with members from Malta attends the first Mass of Pope Benedict XVI in the Vatican. Also first Papal audience with Pope Benedict XVI, A series of communications follow.
2006 Sept 8th the Order signs the Charter 2000 and is now formally under Authority of the church with the Catholic Patriarch Gregory III of Antioch, all East of Alexandria and Jerusalem. The Vatican instructs us to use the name Military Order Knights of Christ, Temple of Jerusalem."
The fact is; McG attended mass in the square all dressed up in his cape like thousands of others and has never had an audience, he just attended mass in the square and when he first stated he had patronage in 2002 ; Gregory III of Antioch, all East of Alexandria and Jerusalem had never heard of them.
He went further to send a letter via his representative to have their claims of his patonage removed as lies. He still does not accept them. Mcg now claims he has patronage because Gregory III of Antioch, all East of Alexandria and Jerusalem refuse to correspond with him ...he claims they have not said no, so the answer must be yes? Unfortunately for McG the The Vox still stands and no Catholic priest can recognise him as a Templar as he is not one.
Since then these two tyrannical leaders of SKT OCMTH have been steadily inventing more of their own fantasy wannabe influence club structure... including the fantastically ludicrous claims of 5 magical princes that were never part of the Orders history or statutes or rank structure, but dementia has seemingly taken hold of the older leader and history has shown he has always felt comfortable with blatant lies in this pseudo and very antichristian Neoclub.
This club although seemingly accepting are misogynistic in their dealings with their own members at any rank, and despite public acceptance of accepting all Christian groups, they have proven dismissive of anyone who is not a Catholic or male.
They have conducted internal persecutions of protestants and are the source of most of the current ill feeling between differing clubs( as most clubs are led by ex and ousted members of this lot ). This routinely happens to senior members after they discover McG’s lies and foolhardy causes such as the false supposed prince of Scotland, La Fosse (whom McG pledged his club’s allegiance /fealty to).
One current leader of the OSMTH1 (Comr); used to be the Grand Prior of Scotland for SKT OCMTH, and when he proved these La Foss claims to be lies, he was quickly EXPELLED (as he had embarrassed McG by exposing his increasingly demented ways). Tyranny rules before truth for the SKT OCMTH.
http://www.123people.co.uk/ext/frm?ti=person%20finder&search_term=greyham%20flockhart&search_country=GB&st=person%20finder&target_url=http%3A%2F%2Ftemplars.wordpress.com%2Fchronology%2F%23comment-9353§ion=blog&wrt_id=261
The ex Chef Mondial and magic fairy prince McG maybe has an age-related excuse and needs our sympathy, but the new falsely installed Chef Mondial Greyham GFR is just unfortunately incredibly incompetent and has no idea of much at all. It is sad really for this relatively junior templar pretender that he had this position thrust upon him as he is definitely not up to the task. He is reported to claim along with his paranoid newly and falsely selected Patriarch from Portugal( Lois) that the Boy Scouts, Lions, Jaycees, Red Cross, etc are all evil Masonic fronts...and any involvement with these great charities is Masonic worship and unchristian. These groups have eradicated whole diseases and helped millions across the world whilst the only apparent charitable service this templar club offers is to hold free bagpipe lessons to local Edinburgh children over the last decade.The whole SKT OCMTH group is led by paranoid and very unchristian egomaniacs.
It does not take genius to recognise that these supposed evil clubs (red cross/ lions/jaycees/scouts/masons/ club have huge humanitarian outreaches and deserve support and praise. By their actions they shall be known. Interestingly the Canadian, Croatian, Australian, Phillipines and Slovenian groups associated with the SKT OCMTH which sprung up around 2008 have all folded or publicly dissociated because of the unchristian acts of the SKT OCMTH leadership and directions directly from the Catholic Church to not associate with them.
Incredibly one European leader was reportedly expelled for having a heart attack and not being able to answer emails, when the leaderships mistake was pointed out, the OCMTH SKT leadership or Chef Mondial GFR held fast to the original poor decision and lost many senior members respect and membership. It was reported that both the entire Slovenian, Phillipines, Australian and most of the Croatian membership all resigned in protest. However the American SKT OCMTH GP WV, Fairy prince McG and Chef Mondial GFR were too egotistical to rescind and repair this abhorrent expulsion; this type of behaviour had previously been shown when called to protect their now retired and jaded Canadian female GP as well. Very recently( in mid 2010) the SKT OCMTH installed a Shaman who believes in reincarnation ( R.L.) and not in Christ ; and this man takes money to guide people through the spirit world and is married to a ex “soft” pornography starlet as the Slovenian GP( after they had pushed the Catholic leader out via bullying). They really are quite delusional if they think this gives them any credibility.
This is doubly sad when you consider this particular SKT OCMTH clubs history of nurturing the fake archbishop GM Beever( he actually stalked and harassed the Canadian GP while the other members did nothing) and McGs recognition and fealty oath to the fake Scottish Prince La Foss. When this information was exposed to them their leader OCMTH McG kicked out and exiled the messengers and let these expelled frauds he had nurtured loose on the community without warning, he protected no one, he instead concentrated his efforts on hiding from his own mistakes like a child, while the community suffered from these people he had raised in his own image.
The only time he ever exposed one of them was when his position as leader of the SKT OCMTH was later challenged by his fake and expelled archbishop Gary Martin Beever.
Ex SKT OCMTH member and current OSMTH1&2 false archbishop Beever took the OCMTH’s McG to court on the 3rd December 2004 in the Aldershot & Farnham County Court under claim# 4AF03936 for exposing Beever as a fraud to the public. The court found every point in the OCMTH’s favour and OSMTH USA’s pet false archbishop Gary M Beever was ordered to defrock in court. However this came about because McG kicked out Beever and then never protected the public.
The whole incident was not about protecting the public; if you study the case you will see that it was because Beever was trying to take over the Order.
McG was quite happy for this fake archbishop he had “created” to fleece the public until Beever tried to steal his fake order from him...not very Christian this McG fellow and his fake Order,ie Psalm 115.
McG only ever protects himself and not the Church or the Templar name.
http://translate.google.com.au/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://osmth-france.e-monsite.com/rubrique,osmth-histoire,8234.html&prev=/search%3Fq%3DFon%2Bosmth%2B2009%26hl%3Den%26rlz%3D1T4GZHZ_enAU238AU238%26sa%3DN%26start%3D30
This has led to very strange priories just magically inventing themselves, One fake Grand Prior is even in Scotland, he was a junior Knight of the SKT OCMTH pretenders for less than a year before being supposedly tricked into resigning (April 2007)over the use of a false name with the Bank of Scotland and typically he invented some Titles for himself such Baron of Comria and Baron of Dunria and the Baron of Strathhearn to name a few.
All of these titles were proven false; and he is really a small time (but published) genealogy researcher and apiarist living in a rented room at an estate but he still has some of his wild claims up today at http://pipl.com/directory/name/Macgregor/Gordon
So our man of many names (Comr) was kicked out of one false Templar pretender group in 2008 (skt ocmth) and immediately started his own branch association with OSMTH1....now the two of them trade insults about who is real...the fact is... they both are in pretending their existence because of a freemason from Belgium who established a socialite club in the 1800’s. This is not really an issue to me, but considering SKT OCMTH’s dedicated non-Masonic stance, it is very funny that they forget that their founder was a Belgian freemason.
The non Masonic stance is even stranger when you consider Mr Sheries (he led the original schism from OSMTH1) untimely death 1963(the vacuum he left was abused) and his tolerance of Masonic members. Yes there was yet another schism in the 1960’s when SKT OCMTH( originally called ASMOTJ) broke from OSMTH1 ). McG and his latest protégé GFR carefully manage the truth, but reality is that this SKT OCMTH group comes from the OSMTH1 Fon group...not any real historical links with Scotland (as they seem to lie continually about).
No doubt there were Templars in Scotland but they have nothing to do with McG or his SKT OCMTH, They were just Templars who lived in Scotland; any other link is pure fantasy. Now remember McG was originally a Fon OSMTH1 follower and thus his club is based on the history of Belgium/Switzerland and Portugal and the freemason founder of SMOTJ.
No one in his club’s history is or was ever a part of a Scottish Templar group(as none ever existed). It is true that there were Templars who were Scottish, but there was never a separate autonomous Order of Scottish Templars.
There is also no link to his 1980 founded neoclub SKT OCMTH beginnings and Scottish Templarism as proven by the 1960’s split from OSMTH1 and McG has just deviously attached himself to something that never existed. He has done this purely for his own glorification and not for any service to God.
This all happened when upon Sheries death, one of his surviving ( but very junior) members (McG) saw the opportunity to forward his own non freemason agenda to allow himself to be the “self appointed King” and so began his real cause ...the search for Vatican recognition at any persons or truths cost and any who decided to allow truth to be known were quickly expelled or slandered. Of course he is known for all the wrong reasons to the Catholic Church.
McG used this unfortunate circumstance of Sheries death and took over the Priory and indeed started his invention (and what after many name changes/schisms and years would become the) SKT OCMTH. He claims his right via supposed whispered dying wishes of a terminally ill and heavily sedated Sherie and also claimed that there were dubious secret meetings that no one else (even Frank’s wife had ever heard of) where no other Templar was present and no documents were ever produced.
The man who subsequently led the newest Schism to form OSMTH2 Scotland( est 2007 Mr Comr) is also fond of this tactic. Although this secret meeting tactic was first utilised by Fon Snr, McG has (over time) perfected it and he claims it whenever he is caught lying...McG consistently claims secret meetings and elections where none has ever existed. He did this to an American named We-er when his old IFA club was still running strong and bestowed the laughable NATO priory establishment in the nineties to him...very funny! It highlights how self deluded these 2 poor souls such as We-er and McG really are.
Mr We-er has the arrogance to call himself (as he has no other members) a Grand Priory after a political alliance treaty of the second world war or NATO. He is very sick, pray for him please as I have also noted he no longer prays for himself.
Now look at this statement from the OSMTH2 pretender,
www.sinclair.quarterman.org/archive/1999/msg03348.html
where Mr Zub admits he has been a freemason for 25 years.
Now look at the below link and pictures. It clearly shows all three ( Fon, Comr and Zub) are in league together and that they should not be and can never be real Templars. Otherwise the Comr would have to publically disassociate and expel his friend and freemason GP Zub Jnr and his Boss Fon, but Comr has his own secrets to hide; so he won't follow the Vaticans decree and will just keep pretending to be a Templar as long as there is a pound in it. He is not and has never been a Christian. This proves it.
http://ordomilitaristempli.org/Chap_Gen_2008.html
I think we had better have a closer look at Mr Comr in the next blog update.
Saturday, June 26, 2010
Sunday, May 23, 2010
Templar debunking of masonic links
debunking of freemasonry links to Knight Templars
firstly..... freemasons are not the historical Knight Templars and can never be....as per the numerous still active Papal bulls....
They all state that Freemasonry is incompatible with Christianity...just a plain simple truth...ecumenical or not. Besides they didn’t exist as anything but a guild until the mid 1700’s when Napoleon gave the stonemasons’ guild a boost because he was afraid of losing power and his head if the looming revolution took hold.
The Masons have trademarked the term though in the USA... and are Knight Templars of Masonry...nothing to do with the Christian historical links. Secondly, this is further proven by the writing of (the then Freemason head of Scotland) Albert Mackey in chapter x and xxix of his published history of Scottish masonry in Scotland ....he admits it’s a false claim...and uses the information he has found on real Templars to invent the freemasons Yorke rite ...loosely based upon this found information.....in about 1870 he published his book admitting all this. Thirdly the Masons are not bad or evil people just because they are masons...
Freemasons just do not have, and can never have, true Templar links. They are very generous in charity and worthy of praise for these deeds though and unfortunately have used a name they erroneously thought to be defunct in order to start a new group within their ranks.
see here for a start ; www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/masonic-legends.html
or
Coil's Masonic Encyclopedia also adds,
"This theory of Templar origin which, mythical as it is and wholly unsubstantiated by the authority of history, has exercised a vast influence in the fabrication of advanced Degrees and the invention of Continental Rites."
Since Freemasonry became more than a guild in the 1700’s the Catholic Church has set to separate itself from these very misguided souls,
Some Documents of the past and the present Pope(s) on Masonry:
CLEMNE XII In Eminenti, const. 24 Apr. 1738
BENEDICT XIV Providas, const. 18 May 1751
PIUS VII Ecclesiam a Jesu Christo, const. 13 Sept.
1821LEO XII Quo Graviora, const. 13 Mar. 1825
PIUS VIII Traditi Humilitati, ency. 24 May 1829
GREGORY XVI Mirari Vos, encyc. 15 Aug. 1832
PIUS IX Qui Pluribus, encyc. 9 Nov. 1846
LEO XIII Humanum Genus, encyc. 20 Apr. 1884
LEO XIII Dall' Alto Dell' Opostolico, Seggio, encyc.
LEO XIII Inimica Vos, encyc. 8 Dec. 1892,.
LEO XIII Custodi Di Quella Fede, encyc. 8 Dec. 1892
If you have no starting bias it is easy and logical to see this is a fact and not for debate.
Cardinal Ratzinger from the latest Vatican document. 1983 AD... Ps. He is the present Pope.
Here are some of his words:
"The Declaration of the Sacred Congregation; affirms that membership in Masonic Associations remain forbidden by the Church and the Faithful who enrol in them are in a state of grave sin, and may not receive Holy Communion or the Sacraments. It confirms to the faithful that membership in a Masonic Lodge is unlawful. It warns them such membership is incompatible with the Catholic Faith."
As do other churches, such as the Southern Baptist Church, here they outline position on freemasonry, and state they do not recognise freemasons
http://www.sbc.net/aboutus/faqs.asp#19
or
http://www.sbc.net/resolutions/amResolution.asp?ID=328
Quakers and even the Amish reject it publicly as shown here.
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=fNQmTsgp_ucC&pg=PA157&lpg=PA157&dq=amish+AND+FREEMASONRY&source=bl&ots=ab-cF5lKwi&sig=nJWJP0wsxkeTyQSLOj4pDRIe05Q&hl=en&ei=MUmPSuu9IYmmtAON6f3bDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6#v=onepage&q=&f=falsehttp://www.2be1ask1.com/library/enemies.html
The Anglican Church and Synod also has the same opinion of Freemasons.
here is a link that shows the Anglican/COE stance;
http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/Elite-trainer-gets-11year-state.4053633.jphttp://centurean2.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/update-common-purpose-exposed-bbc-taking-our-cash-for-cp-training/http://www.ukcolumn.org/2008/02/01/common-purpose-a-criminal-organisation/
It is just another frocked up freemason group and also under continual investigation calling themselves Common Purpose
Let us face facts , no real Christian Church does accept it.
But some people always want more, so feast on these tidbits;
CHAPTER XXIX of THE STORY OF THE SCOTTISH TEMPLARS (from The History of Freemasonry, Albert G. Mackey) ends this chapter with these wise words...not that our Canadian Senior Masonic story writer or Masonic leader of OSMTH USA would like you to know...
“On the contrary, it is supposed to have been the fabrication of Michael Ramsay in the 18th Century. On this subject the remarks of Bro. Lyon, who has made the Masonry of Scotland his especial study, are well worth citation. "The ritual of the Royal Order of Scotland embraces," he says, "what may be termed a spiritualization of the supposed symbols and ceremonies of the Christian architects and builders of primitive times, and so closely associates the sword with the trowel as to lead to the second degree being denominated an order of Masonic knighthood, which its recipients are asked to believe was first conferred on the field of Bannockburn, as a reward for the valour that had been displayed by a body of Templars who aided Bruce in that memorable victory; and that afterward a Grand Lodge of the Order was established by the King at Kilwinning, with the reservation of the office of Grand Master to him and his successors on the Scottish throne. It is further asserted that the Royal Order and the Masonic Fraternity of Kilwinning were governed by the same head. As regards the claims to antiquity, and a royal origin that are advanced in favour of this rite, it is proper to say that modern inquiries have shown these to be purely fabulous. The credence that is given to that part of the legend which associates the Order with the ancient Lodge of Kilwinning is based on the assumed certainty that Lodge possessed in former times a knowledge of other degrees of Masonry than those of St. John. But such is not the case. The fraternity of Kilwinning never at any period practiced or acknowledged other than the Craft degrees; neither does there exist any tradition worthy of the name, local or national, nor has any authentic document yet been discovered that can in the remotest degree be held to identify Robert Bruce with the holding of Masonic Courts, or the institution of a secret society at Kilwinning."
1 "History of the Lodge of Edinburgh," by David Murray Lyon, chap. xxxii., P. 307.
Freemasons would now ask you to believe that the Soldiers of Christ were armed with trowels and rejected Christ,... although the mason’s themselves couldn’t find any links..... For these historical Templars to have indeed become Masons, they must have been demoted from the highest of their society to the lowest of freemen and manual labourers...and yet our modern OSMTH2 USA masons want you to believe the Templar remnants willingly transformed themselves into Stonemasons and hired labourers .... a fairy tale too absurd to for even the most simple of folk surely, but not to strange evidently for these deceptive self serving freemasons.
Freemason’s have simply and deceptively invented new stories " dressed up" as traditions in order to invent a link between Freemasonry and Templarism, or to establish any close connection between the two Institutions.
They have however failed in their object. Freemasons have attempted to write an absurd history and they continue to do so through their imaginative authors such as a very talented canadian writer of fiction.
It must be said that Freemasonry does some great things throughout the world and whilst I personally would not care to join them; they do have an affluent base to collect the huge tithes and they even sponsor priests to do pilgrimages to the holy land.
The freemasons however are not honest in their dealings with most things and are working towards expansion of their club’s influence and not the Churches.
As I have stated and shown; you do not have to be Christian to be a Masonic styled templar, you could actually be a Rosicrucian, ending up being a devil worshipper of Baphomet. Heaven forbid if your skin was not white... or worse you were a Catholic!
http://www.mastermason.com/bridgeportlodge181/evolu29.HTM
http://www.capecodmasons.org/ANCHOR%20ARTICLE.htm
http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/religion/re0161.html
To be a Freemason, one must:
1. be a man who comes of his own free will
2. believe in a Supreme Being, or, in some jurisdictions, a Creative Principle (unless joining a jurisdiction with no religious requirement, as in the Continental tradition),
3. be at least the minimum age (18 - 25 years depending on the jurisdiction, but commonly 21),
4. be of sound mind, body and of good morals, and
5. be free (or "born free", i.e. not born a slave or bondsman),
6. have one or two references from current Masons (depending on jurisdiction).
Note:
Point 2... You do not have to be Christian to be Templar with them?...incredible!
Point 5...they support slavery even today and refuse ex-slaves.
http://infao5501.ag5.mpi-sb.mpg.de:8080/topx/archive?link=Wikipedia-Lip6-2/11227.xml&style
http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/grandlodge/landmarks.html
Here is where the Pike the founder of the Scottish Yorke rite of freemasonry Templarism demeans God and states he is no better than an ideal or the devil. He also states Gatou is supreme above the Christian God.
Albert Pike (1809-91),
“The god of Freemasonry and the God of the Bible are not one and the same. There is a great difference between the two concepts of God. The Masonic god, "The Great Architect of the Universe" (G.A.O.T.U), is believed to be above all other gods. '
According to Albert Pike, all people,
'regardless of their spiritual orientation, can unite under the "Grand Artificer of the Universe." The Masonic god is all-inclusive and all-embracing. All potential Masons must acknowledge a "God" in order to gain membership in the Lodge, but there is no definite criterion regarding which "God" is implied or what "God" is acceptable.” it could be a paper bag or the devil himself or a pile of dog excrement as long as you claim to worship it.
Albert Pike (1809-91),
called the papacy a "deadly, treacherous enemy," and in his letter dated Dec. 28, 1886, to the Italian Grand Commander Timoteo Riboli, he wrote, "The Papacy has been for a thousand years the torturer and curse of Humanity, the most shameless imposture, in its pretense to spiritual power of all ages."
Pike states that Masonry is the unifier of all religions and that "the Christian, the Hebrew, the Moslem, the Brahmin, the followers of Confucius and Zoroaster, can assemble as brethren and unite in prayer to the one God who is above all the Baalim." he is speaking of the freemasons’ own deity GATOU.
In other words, the biblical God is reduced to the level of all the other gods and at the same time rendered as equal with the gods of those religions. Therefore, Christianity is stripped of its uniqueness as the one true religion that offers humanity the only hope for salvation and diminishes the co-equal and co-eternal status of Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit.
The Masonic god is clearly given a greater position among all other "gods."
Albert Pike spoke of
"God as being One; Unapproachable, Single, Eternal and Unchanging. . . . There is but one God, infinite and incomprehensible, to whom no human attribute can be properly assigned, even when imagined to be infinite." When speaking of GAOTU.
Albert Pike (1809-91),
"To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st, and 30th degrees - The Masonic Religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian Doctrine."
(Instructions to the 23 Supreme Councils of the World, Albert Pike, Grand Commander, Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry, July 14, 1889. Recorded by A.C. De La Rive, La Femme et l'Enfant dans la Franc-Maconnerie Universelle, page 588)
or
Albert Pike (1809-91), 33° Mason...
"That which we must say to a crowd is - We worship a God, but it is the God that one adores without superstition. To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st, and 30th degrees - The Masonic Religion should be, by all of us initates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian Doctrine. If Lucifer were not God, would Adonay whose deeds prove his cruelty, perdify and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion for science, would Adonay and his priests, calumniate him? Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also god. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods: darkness being necessary to the statue, and the brake to the locomotive. Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil. "
Or for fun look here
www.pakistanchristianpost.com/letterdetails.php?letterid=177
Strangely the author was at the time a high level SKT OCMTH knight who has now defected against his own advice on loyalty and fealty and sadly become a practicing low level mason and regular low level member of the OSMTH USA, he was oused because he stood against his groups persecution of women and Protestants conducted by the OCMTH current USA leader, he also now heads his own USA OSMTH style neoclub est.2007.
Here are some more quotes from the founder of the freemasonry scottish rite.
Albert Pike 33° Mason...
"That which we must say to a crowd is - We worship a God, but it is the God that one adores without superstition. To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st, and 30th degrees - The Masonic Religion should be, by all of us initates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian Doctrine. If Lucifer were not God, would Adonay whose deeds prove his cruelty, perdify and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion for science, would Adonay and his priests, calumniate him? Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also god. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods: darkness being necessary to the statue, and the brake to the locomotive. Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil. "
or this classic.
Instructions to the 23 Supreme Councils of the World, July 14, 1889. Recorded by A.C. De La Rive in La Femme et l'Enfant dans la FrancMaconnerie Universelle on page 588'
"Lucifer, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the son of the morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with it's splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual or selfish Souls? Doubt it not" Morals and Dogma page 321
Next blog we explore a few of the more popular neo groups calling themselves Templars and their real and very dodgy histories.
firstly..... freemasons are not the historical Knight Templars and can never be....as per the numerous still active Papal bulls....
They all state that Freemasonry is incompatible with Christianity...just a plain simple truth...ecumenical or not. Besides they didn’t exist as anything but a guild until the mid 1700’s when Napoleon gave the stonemasons’ guild a boost because he was afraid of losing power and his head if the looming revolution took hold.
The Masons have trademarked the term though in the USA... and are Knight Templars of Masonry...nothing to do with the Christian historical links. Secondly, this is further proven by the writing of (the then Freemason head of Scotland) Albert Mackey in chapter x and xxix of his published history of Scottish masonry in Scotland ....he admits it’s a false claim...and uses the information he has found on real Templars to invent the freemasons Yorke rite ...loosely based upon this found information.....in about 1870 he published his book admitting all this. Thirdly the Masons are not bad or evil people just because they are masons...
Freemasons just do not have, and can never have, true Templar links. They are very generous in charity and worthy of praise for these deeds though and unfortunately have used a name they erroneously thought to be defunct in order to start a new group within their ranks.
see here for a start ; www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/masonic-legends.html
or
Coil's Masonic Encyclopedia also adds,
"This theory of Templar origin which, mythical as it is and wholly unsubstantiated by the authority of history, has exercised a vast influence in the fabrication of advanced Degrees and the invention of Continental Rites."
Since Freemasonry became more than a guild in the 1700’s the Catholic Church has set to separate itself from these very misguided souls,
Some Documents of the past and the present Pope(s) on Masonry:
CLEMNE XII In Eminenti, const. 24 Apr. 1738
BENEDICT XIV Providas, const. 18 May 1751
PIUS VII Ecclesiam a Jesu Christo, const. 13 Sept.
1821LEO XII Quo Graviora, const. 13 Mar. 1825
PIUS VIII Traditi Humilitati, ency. 24 May 1829
GREGORY XVI Mirari Vos, encyc. 15 Aug. 1832
PIUS IX Qui Pluribus, encyc. 9 Nov. 1846
LEO XIII Humanum Genus, encyc. 20 Apr. 1884
LEO XIII Dall' Alto Dell' Opostolico, Seggio, encyc.
LEO XIII Inimica Vos, encyc. 8 Dec. 1892,.
LEO XIII Custodi Di Quella Fede, encyc. 8 Dec. 1892
If you have no starting bias it is easy and logical to see this is a fact and not for debate.
Cardinal Ratzinger from the latest Vatican document. 1983 AD... Ps. He is the present Pope.
Here are some of his words:
"The Declaration of the Sacred Congregation; affirms that membership in Masonic Associations remain forbidden by the Church and the Faithful who enrol in them are in a state of grave sin, and may not receive Holy Communion or the Sacraments. It confirms to the faithful that membership in a Masonic Lodge is unlawful. It warns them such membership is incompatible with the Catholic Faith."
As do other churches, such as the Southern Baptist Church, here they outline position on freemasonry, and state they do not recognise freemasons
http://www.sbc.net/aboutus/faqs.asp#19
or
http://www.sbc.net/resolutions/amResolution.asp?ID=328
Quakers and even the Amish reject it publicly as shown here.
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=fNQmTsgp_ucC&pg=PA157&lpg=PA157&dq=amish+AND+FREEMASONRY&source=bl&ots=ab-cF5lKwi&sig=nJWJP0wsxkeTyQSLOj4pDRIe05Q&hl=en&ei=MUmPSuu9IYmmtAON6f3bDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6#v=onepage&q=&f=falsehttp://www.2be1ask1.com/library/enemies.html
The Anglican Church and Synod also has the same opinion of Freemasons.
here is a link that shows the Anglican/COE stance;
http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/Elite-trainer-gets-11year-state.4053633.jphttp://centurean2.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/update-common-purpose-exposed-bbc-taking-our-cash-for-cp-training/http://www.ukcolumn.org/2008/02/01/common-purpose-a-criminal-organisation/
It is just another frocked up freemason group and also under continual investigation calling themselves Common Purpose
Let us face facts , no real Christian Church does accept it.
But some people always want more, so feast on these tidbits;
CHAPTER XXIX of THE STORY OF THE SCOTTISH TEMPLARS (from The History of Freemasonry, Albert G. Mackey) ends this chapter with these wise words...not that our Canadian Senior Masonic story writer or Masonic leader of OSMTH USA would like you to know...
“On the contrary, it is supposed to have been the fabrication of Michael Ramsay in the 18th Century. On this subject the remarks of Bro. Lyon, who has made the Masonry of Scotland his especial study, are well worth citation. "The ritual of the Royal Order of Scotland embraces," he says, "what may be termed a spiritualization of the supposed symbols and ceremonies of the Christian architects and builders of primitive times, and so closely associates the sword with the trowel as to lead to the second degree being denominated an order of Masonic knighthood, which its recipients are asked to believe was first conferred on the field of Bannockburn, as a reward for the valour that had been displayed by a body of Templars who aided Bruce in that memorable victory; and that afterward a Grand Lodge of the Order was established by the King at Kilwinning, with the reservation of the office of Grand Master to him and his successors on the Scottish throne. It is further asserted that the Royal Order and the Masonic Fraternity of Kilwinning were governed by the same head. As regards the claims to antiquity, and a royal origin that are advanced in favour of this rite, it is proper to say that modern inquiries have shown these to be purely fabulous. The credence that is given to that part of the legend which associates the Order with the ancient Lodge of Kilwinning is based on the assumed certainty that Lodge possessed in former times a knowledge of other degrees of Masonry than those of St. John. But such is not the case. The fraternity of Kilwinning never at any period practiced or acknowledged other than the Craft degrees; neither does there exist any tradition worthy of the name, local or national, nor has any authentic document yet been discovered that can in the remotest degree be held to identify Robert Bruce with the holding of Masonic Courts, or the institution of a secret society at Kilwinning."
1 "History of the Lodge of Edinburgh," by David Murray Lyon, chap. xxxii., P. 307.
Freemasons would now ask you to believe that the Soldiers of Christ were armed with trowels and rejected Christ,... although the mason’s themselves couldn’t find any links..... For these historical Templars to have indeed become Masons, they must have been demoted from the highest of their society to the lowest of freemen and manual labourers...and yet our modern OSMTH2 USA masons want you to believe the Templar remnants willingly transformed themselves into Stonemasons and hired labourers .... a fairy tale too absurd to for even the most simple of folk surely, but not to strange evidently for these deceptive self serving freemasons.
Freemason’s have simply and deceptively invented new stories " dressed up" as traditions in order to invent a link between Freemasonry and Templarism, or to establish any close connection between the two Institutions.
They have however failed in their object. Freemasons have attempted to write an absurd history and they continue to do so through their imaginative authors such as a very talented canadian writer of fiction.
It must be said that Freemasonry does some great things throughout the world and whilst I personally would not care to join them; they do have an affluent base to collect the huge tithes and they even sponsor priests to do pilgrimages to the holy land.
The freemasons however are not honest in their dealings with most things and are working towards expansion of their club’s influence and not the Churches.
As I have stated and shown; you do not have to be Christian to be a Masonic styled templar, you could actually be a Rosicrucian, ending up being a devil worshipper of Baphomet. Heaven forbid if your skin was not white... or worse you were a Catholic!
http://www.mastermason.com/bridgeportlodge181/evolu29.HTM
http://www.capecodmasons.org/ANCHOR%20ARTICLE.htm
http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/religion/re0161.html
To be a Freemason, one must:
1. be a man who comes of his own free will
2. believe in a Supreme Being, or, in some jurisdictions, a Creative Principle (unless joining a jurisdiction with no religious requirement, as in the Continental tradition),
3. be at least the minimum age (18 - 25 years depending on the jurisdiction, but commonly 21),
4. be of sound mind, body and of good morals, and
5. be free (or "born free", i.e. not born a slave or bondsman),
6. have one or two references from current Masons (depending on jurisdiction).
Note:
Point 2... You do not have to be Christian to be Templar with them?...incredible!
Point 5...they support slavery even today and refuse ex-slaves.
http://infao5501.ag5.mpi-sb.mpg.de:8080/topx/archive?link=Wikipedia-Lip6-2/11227.xml&style
http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/grandlodge/landmarks.html
Here is where the Pike the founder of the Scottish Yorke rite of freemasonry Templarism demeans God and states he is no better than an ideal or the devil. He also states Gatou is supreme above the Christian God.
Albert Pike (1809-91),
“The god of Freemasonry and the God of the Bible are not one and the same. There is a great difference between the two concepts of God. The Masonic god, "The Great Architect of the Universe" (G.A.O.T.U), is believed to be above all other gods. '
According to Albert Pike, all people,
'regardless of their spiritual orientation, can unite under the "Grand Artificer of the Universe." The Masonic god is all-inclusive and all-embracing. All potential Masons must acknowledge a "God" in order to gain membership in the Lodge, but there is no definite criterion regarding which "God" is implied or what "God" is acceptable.” it could be a paper bag or the devil himself or a pile of dog excrement as long as you claim to worship it.
Albert Pike (1809-91),
called the papacy a "deadly, treacherous enemy," and in his letter dated Dec. 28, 1886, to the Italian Grand Commander Timoteo Riboli, he wrote, "The Papacy has been for a thousand years the torturer and curse of Humanity, the most shameless imposture, in its pretense to spiritual power of all ages."
Pike states that Masonry is the unifier of all religions and that "the Christian, the Hebrew, the Moslem, the Brahmin, the followers of Confucius and Zoroaster, can assemble as brethren and unite in prayer to the one God who is above all the Baalim." he is speaking of the freemasons’ own deity GATOU.
In other words, the biblical God is reduced to the level of all the other gods and at the same time rendered as equal with the gods of those religions. Therefore, Christianity is stripped of its uniqueness as the one true religion that offers humanity the only hope for salvation and diminishes the co-equal and co-eternal status of Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit.
The Masonic god is clearly given a greater position among all other "gods."
Albert Pike spoke of
"God as being One; Unapproachable, Single, Eternal and Unchanging. . . . There is but one God, infinite and incomprehensible, to whom no human attribute can be properly assigned, even when imagined to be infinite." When speaking of GAOTU.
Albert Pike (1809-91),
"To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st, and 30th degrees - The Masonic Religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian Doctrine."
(Instructions to the 23 Supreme Councils of the World, Albert Pike, Grand Commander, Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry, July 14, 1889. Recorded by A.C. De La Rive, La Femme et l'Enfant dans la Franc-Maconnerie Universelle, page 588)
or
Albert Pike (1809-91), 33° Mason...
"That which we must say to a crowd is - We worship a God, but it is the God that one adores without superstition. To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st, and 30th degrees - The Masonic Religion should be, by all of us initates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian Doctrine. If Lucifer were not God, would Adonay whose deeds prove his cruelty, perdify and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion for science, would Adonay and his priests, calumniate him? Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also god. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods: darkness being necessary to the statue, and the brake to the locomotive. Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil. "
Or for fun look here
www.pakistanchristianpost.com/letterdetails.php?letterid=177
Strangely the author was at the time a high level SKT OCMTH knight who has now defected against his own advice on loyalty and fealty and sadly become a practicing low level mason and regular low level member of the OSMTH USA, he was oused because he stood against his groups persecution of women and Protestants conducted by the OCMTH current USA leader, he also now heads his own USA OSMTH style neoclub est.2007.
Here are some more quotes from the founder of the freemasonry scottish rite.
Albert Pike 33° Mason...
"That which we must say to a crowd is - We worship a God, but it is the God that one adores without superstition. To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st, and 30th degrees - The Masonic Religion should be, by all of us initates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian Doctrine. If Lucifer were not God, would Adonay whose deeds prove his cruelty, perdify and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion for science, would Adonay and his priests, calumniate him? Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also god. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods: darkness being necessary to the statue, and the brake to the locomotive. Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil. "
or this classic.
Instructions to the 23 Supreme Councils of the World, July 14, 1889. Recorded by A.C. De La Rive in La Femme et l'Enfant dans la FrancMaconnerie Universelle on page 588'
"Lucifer, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the son of the morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with it's splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual or selfish Souls? Doubt it not" Morals and Dogma page 321
Next blog we explore a few of the more popular neo groups calling themselves Templars and their real and very dodgy histories.
Monday, January 4, 2010
too many threats again
Sorry I have taken it down AGAIN too allow me to concentrate on things other than zealots and their threats, it is just easier than always fighting these pretenders and masons.
Holiday time with my family!
Holiday time with my family!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)